法官调查取证制度的合理构建  

Discussion about the Reasonable Building of the Judge Investigation System

作　　者：胡利明[1] 

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《南都学坛（南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报）》2015年第6期70-74,共5页Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University

摘　　要：法官调查取证是与诉讼模式选择密切相关的重要的诉讼制度。法官调查取证在时间上应当在庭前完成,主体上由专门庭前法官承担,在方式上、原则上采取间接取证和例外直接取证。按法定程序进行证据交换质证后才能作为定案依据,否则不发生法律效力。作为庭前的法官调查取证,不是庭审程序的必经程序。一般情况下庭审程序之前没有法官调查取证程序,只有在遇到法定情形才可能为之,即庭审程序前可以有也可以没有法官调查取证,庭前取证服务于庭审程序,通俗是说庭前调查取证程序并非必设,即便启动时也只能限定在最小范围和有的确需要调查的必要,并且在调查取证过程中或者之前告知利害关系人,他们有权提出书面异议,以衡平当事人的诉讼利益,从而提升价值绩效,最终形成制度性的"中国特色"。Judge investigation is an important lawsuit system,which is closely related to the litigation mode selection. The parties and functions and powers doctrine lawsuit mode have their own disadvantages,unable to reach the optimal value of the performance. At present,China is in the transformation period of litigation mode,special objective reality needs reasonable construction system of investigation. How to build and what to build have become the important theoretical problems in front of the reality. To construct scientific and reasonable judge investigation system could overcome institutional defects of functions and powers doctrine and learn each other’s advantages to promote value performance,and further form the institutional ＂Chinese Characteristics＂.

关 键 词：法官取证 庭前取证 被动取证 调查取证 中立取证 

分 类 号：D925.113[政治法律—诉讼法学]