检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王寰[1]
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第6期64-69,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:香港近年来的民事司法改革备受瞩目,而最显著的特点是将ADR机制纳入其民事司法体系,尤其是调解程序。对于这样一个普通法系的司法区域,如何将东方"和为贵"的精神与现代的司法理念融合一体,高效地解决各类复杂的纠纷,值得关注。同时中国内地调解文化源远流长,不论是在民间亦或官方一直有其传统而普遍适用的调解方式。然而随着全球化的各种挑战,面对大量复杂繁琐的商事纠纷该如何引入先进的司法制度,构建有效、透明、与国际接轨的纠纷解决制度,是我们亟需面对的问题。Civil justice reform of Hong Kong in recent years has been attracted much attention. One of the most notable features of the reform is the Courts' encouragement and facilitation of the use of alternative dispute resolution methods, in particular the mediation. The reform is, meanwhile, also an example for the China's Mainland which has a long history of mediation but mediation was used injudiciously for many years. This paper compares these two systems and demonstrates that although there are certain problems of Court mediation in China's Mainland, it could be rectified by learning and borrowing from Hong Kong.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49