检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李明斌[1]
机构地区:[1]宜春学院马克思主义学院
出 处:《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2015年第6期63-68,共6页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"民生视阈下的中国特色社会主义道路自信研究"(14BKS023);教育部人文社会科学项目"中国共产党资本主义认识史论"(10YJA710024);河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划项目"中国共产党资本主义认识史研究"(豫教社政2009-861号)
摘 要:中苏论战是社会主义建设史上的重大事件,对中国和苏联的社会主义建设都产生了深远的影响,是一场"双输"的历史悲剧。导致中苏论战的原因是多方面的,社会主义建设道路分歧和两国领导人个人因素是其中的重要因素。苏共不认同中国共产党的"三面红旗"并提出批评,中国共产党认为赫鲁晓夫的"物质刺激"是修正主义,这种分歧和所谓争夺国际共产主义运动的领导权问题交织在一起,增加了问题的复杂性。中苏两国都是权力高度集中的国家,最高领导人个人因素对两党两国关系产生重大的影响。毛泽东认为赫鲁晓夫与自己不是一个层次的领导人,赫鲁晓夫把毛泽东看作是对其国际共运领袖地位的威胁,两个人的文化素质、个性、风格和思维方式也有很大的不同,这些因素都对中苏关系产生了重要的影响。The Sino-Soviet Debate from 1956 to 1966 is of great importance in the history of socialist construction. It also has profound influences on both China's and Soviet Union's socialist construction, and is regarded as a "dunbleloss" historical tragedy. Among the various causes of the debate, there are two noticeable aspects: divergences in Socialism Construction and personal factors of the two countries' top leaders. On the one hand, Soviet Communist Party didn't agree with CPC's Three Red Banners (the General Line for Socialist Construction, the Great Leap Forward and the People's Communes); on the other hand, CPC considered Nikita Khrushchev's "material incentive" to be revisionism. These divergences and the so-called battle for the leadership in the International Communist Movement were intertwined, which made the Sino-Soviet relations even more complicated. Moreover, in both China and Soviet Union, power was highly centralized so that personal factors of the two countries' top leaders played a very important role in the relations of the two countries. Chairman Mao personally didn't like the comparison between Nikita Khrushchev and Mao himself, meanwhile the latter considered Chairman Mao to be his rival in the position of leadership in the International Communist Movement. Actually, Chairman Mao and Nikita Khrushchev are quite different from each other in many aspects, such as cultural accomplishments, personality, ways of leadership, thinking patterns etc.. Those factors brought very negative influence to the relations between China and Soviet Union.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.89