言词原则与民事诉讼改革:基于域外法的观察  

The principle of orality and civil litigation reform:A perspective of overseas jurisdictions

作　　者：赵西巨[1,2] 王云[2] 刘军生[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东中医药大学,济南250355 [2]济南市中级人民法院,济南250001

出　　处：《证据科学》2015年第5期531-543,共13页Evidence Science

摘　　要：言词原则是英美法系诉讼法中的一项基本原则。它与英美法中的对抗主义、陪审团制度和传闻证据排除规则密切相关。英美法国家的民事诉讼改革及其案件管理制度扩大了法官的诉讼干预权,压缩了对抗主义诉讼文化的生长空间,对言词原则也造成了侵蚀。言词原则既有民主的一面,也有奢侈的一面。我国在引进和实施言词原则时,应考虑我国本土的诉讼模式和现状。The principle of orality is a basic principle of procedure law in common law jurisdictions. It is closely related to the adversary system, the jury system and the hearsay rule. The civil litigation reform, occurred in common law jurisdictions, and the ensuing system of case management have enlarged judges’ interventional role, suppressed the adversary culture and eroded the principle of orality. The implementation of the principle of orality is both desirable and expensive. When embracing the principle of orality, China needs to take its own situations into account.

关 键 词：言词原则 对抗主义 法官案件管理 民事诉讼改革 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]