检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟志兵[1] 黄锦华[1] 张强[1] 郭军[1] 常财旺[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省扬州市第一人民医院口腔科,江苏扬州225001
出 处:《口腔颌面外科杂志》2015年第5期351-355,共5页Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
摘 要:目的:通过回顾保留副神经的颈淋巴清扫病例中副神经解剖的几种方法 ,分析总结各种方法的优缺点。方法 :本组15例病例中,3例由胸锁乳突肌前缘分离找到副神经大约需25 min;2例由斜方肌前缘分离找到副神经大约需30 min;10例由胸锁乳突肌后缘分离副神经大约需5 min,有的翻瓣完成后即可隐约看见副神经。结果:采用胸锁乳突肌前缘分离找到副神经的3例患者,副神经保留完好,术后肩功能影响较小;采用斜方肌前缘分离找到副神经的2例患者中,有1例分离时副神经被切断,术后肩功能恢复较差;采用胸锁乳突肌后缘分离副神经的10例患者,副神经均保留完好,术后肩功能恢复较好。结论:3种解剖方法中,自胸锁乳突肌后缘分离副神经的方法较简便快捷。Objective:To compare the pros and cons of different surgical techniques on the exposure of accessory nerve in neck dissection. Methods:15 cases with preservation of accessory nerve who underwent neck dissection were retrospec-tively reviewed. 3 kinds of exposure techniques were employed in this review:group A, through the anterior border of ster-nocleidomastoid muscle( 3 cases);group B, through the anterior border of trapezius muscle (2 cases);group C, through the posterior border of sternocleidomastoid muscle ( 10 cases). The advantages and disadvantages between these methods were summarized. Results:It took 25 minutes of operative length in group A, 30 minutes in group B, and 5 minutes in group C. In some cases, accessory nerves could be recognized immediately after exposure of the flap. In group B, the accessory nerves was cut off in one case, the shoulder function was poorly recovered after surgery. Conclusion:Exposure of accesso-ry nerve through the posterior border of sternocleidomastoid muscle during neck dissection was relatively simple and quick.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229