中国民间故事志的学术史回顾及反思  

A historical reflection on the academic history of folktale ethnography

作　　者：漆凌云[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学文学与新闻传播学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第6期36-43,共8页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目"中国民间故事研究史论"(13CZW091);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"中国当代民间故事研究史论"(12YJC751062)

摘　　要：民间故事志核心内容是民间故事的采录和讲述。20世纪50年代民间故事志的学术实践因民间文艺工作者和研究者立场不同,对民间故事认识在文学性与科学性、宣传教育与学术研究上呈现分歧,"忠实记录"原则在故事采录中并未得到真正落实。20世纪80年代后,民间故事采录的科学性开始受重视,学者们提出立体记录观点,民间故事的讲述语境和故事家的生活史开始受到关注。21世纪初期,随着一批民间故事学人对民间故事讲述进行长期深入调查,民间故事志的学术实践呈现从生活史研究向心灵史研究过渡。民间故事讲述不仅是种日常交流活动,还是特定地域讲述者和听众在精神世界的交往。故事志心灵史研究范式的确立有助于中国民间故事研究走出本体意识薄弱的困境。The core content of folktale ethnography is the collection and narration of folk tales. In the 1950s, different researchers of literature and art had different understandings of the literariness and scientificity of folktales due to their different academic practices, and they did not follow strictly the principle of ＂faithful record＂ in their folktale collection. Since the 1980s, the scientificity of the folktale collection has received more attention, and the scholars concerned have advocated the view of multi-dimensional recording, and as a result the narrative context of folktales and the life of the storytellers have received more attention. In the early 21st century, with a number of folktale scholars＂ long-term and in-depth investigations of the narration of folktales, the academic practice of folktale ethnography has experienced a transition from the study of the life history of the story tellers to the study of the history of the mind. Folktale narration is not only a kind of exchange in their daily life, but also a spiritual communication between the story teller and the audience in a given context. The establishment of the research paradigm of the spiritual history of folktale ethnography will help make some breakthroughs in the predicament of weak ontological consciousness in the study of Chinese folktales.

关 键 词：民间故事志 忠实记录 立体记录 生活史 心灵史 

分 类 号：I27[文学—中国文学]