论我国《刑法》第307条的适用范围——从“帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪”之“帮助”切入  

On the Scope of Article 307 Application of the Criminal Law Of the People's Republic of China——with “Help”in the“Crime of Helping Destroying,Falsifying Evidence”as Clue

作　　者：赵冠男[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第12期133-140,共8页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：重庆市研究生科研创新课题"刑民界限新论--基于不得已原则视角"(课题号:CYB14025)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：通说认为,我国《刑法》第307条适用于所有类型的诉讼。可是,因第307条第2款中"帮助"一词的存在,司法实践中屡现民事诉讼当事人本人并非"帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪"之适格主体的难题。随意地主张删除该"帮助"一词并不可取。通过"帮助"排除当事人构成此罪之可能,是基于"期待可能性"考量而作出的立法抉择。据此,只有刑事诉讼中的被告人才会因缺乏期待可能性而主体不适格。相应地,我国《刑法》第307条的适用范围仅限于刑事诉讼。According to the general viewpoint is Article 307th of the criminal law applicable to all types of proceedings. However, due to the existence of ＂help＂ in the 2th paragraph of article 307th could the parties in civil proceedings not be punished based on ＂Crime of Helping Destroying, Falsifying Evidence＂ The random claim of deleting ＂help＂ is not advisable. The legitimate explanation of the existence of ＂help＂ is a legislative choice made based on considerations of the reasonableness of the legal behavior. Accordingly, only the defendant in criminal proceedings will not constitute the crime due to lack of the reasonableness of the legal behavior. Correspondingly, Article 307th applies only to criminal proceedings.

关 键 词：第307条 刑事诉讼 帮助毁灭 伪造证据罪 期待可能性 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]