检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈闻高[1]
机构地区:[1]四川警察学院,四川泸州646000
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2015年第5期76-82,共7页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:任意侦查的标准具有局限性。侦查的强制性分为外在强制性和内在强制性。秘密侦查和公开侦查中的任意性体现了现代侦查的深刻矛盾,使任意和强制具有相对性。侦查活动中权利与权力、义务与职责的法律关系,反映出其中的任意性与强制性,二者有彼此渗透的复杂关系。当事人权利与侦查权力中的"任意"情形及其法律关系需得到正视,侦查活动法律矛盾需在案侦实践中辨析、引导和平衡,立法需反映案侦规律,激发能动执法的正能量。The standard of arbitrary investigation has its limitations. Coerciveness of investigation is divided in- to exterior coerciveness and internal coerciveness. The randomicity of secret investigation and public investigation, embodying profound self - contradiction of modern investigation, makes arbitrary investigation and compulsive in- vestigation more relative. The legal relation of rights and power, responsibility and duty in investigation, reflects the arbitrary and compulsive, which has complex infiltration relationship. The arbitrary situation and the legal rela- tion of litigant's right and investigation right in investigation need to be envisaged. And the legal contradiction should be discriminated, guided and balanced. Legislation should reflect case detection rule and motivate positive energy of dynamic enforcement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171