检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]空军第一航空学院,河南信阳464000 [2]空军预警学院,武汉430019 [3]青岛求实职业技术学院,山东青岛266108
出 处:《空军预警学院学报》2015年第6期407-410,共4页Journal of Air Force Early Warning Academy
基 金:ISN国家重点实验室开放课题资助项目
摘 要:为满足航空自组网对路由协议的需要,对DSDV、AODV、OLSR三种路由协议的性能进行了研究.首先利用NS-3网络仿真平台搭建了航空自组网的网络模型,然后在航空通信环境下对三种路由协议进行仿真,并从分组交付率、平均延时、吞吐量、路由开销等指标性能进行比较,最后得出在节点密度小、网络拓扑变化快的航空自组网中,AODV路由协议的性能总体优于DSDV和OLSR路由协议,但还存在着路由开销较大的问题.In order to meet the demand of aeronautical Ad Hoc network by its routing protocol, this paper studies the performances on such three types of protocols as DSDV, AODV and OLSR. Firstly, the network model of aeronautical Ad Hoc is set up by using NS-3 network simulation platform, next, those three types of routing protocols are simulated under the aeronautical communication environment, and meanwhile, those performance indexes including the packet delivery ratio, average delay, throughput, routing overhead and etc. are compared,and finally it comes to a conclusion that the performance on the AODV routing protocol is better overall than the DSDV and OLSR protocols in the aeronautical Ad Hoc network where its node density is small and the network topology changes fast, while the routing overhead is bigger.
关 键 词:航空自组网 路由协议 NS-3网络仿真软件 路由开销
分 类 号:TN915.04[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.212.224