检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳市急救中心培训科,广东深圳518035 [2]深圳市第二人民医院院感科,广东深圳518035 [3]深圳市第二人民医院手术室,广东深圳518035
出 处:《临床医学工程》2015年第12期1669-1670,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的探讨急救护理路径在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)急诊患者中的应用价值。方法选取2012年1月至2015年2月我院收治的行急诊冠状动脉支架植入术(PCI)的ACS患者86例作为研究对象,将其随机分为两组,每组各43例。对照组给予常规急救护理,观察组采取急救护理路径进行护理,观察比较两组患者进门-球囊扩张时间(D-to-B)、住院时间、住院费用、并发症发生情况及护理满意度。结果观察组D-to-B时间、住院时间、住院费用均明显小于对照组,并发症发生率明显低于对照组,护理满意度明显高于对照组,差异均具有显著的统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论对行急诊PCI术治疗的ACS患者实施急救护理路径效果满意,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the application value of emergency nursing pathway in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods 86 ACS patients treated with PCI in our hospital from January 2012 to February 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with 43 cases in each group. The control group was given conventional emergency care, the observation group was given emergency nursing pathway. The D-to-B time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, complications and nursing satisfaction of two groups were compared. Results The D-to-B time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses and incidence of complications in observation group were significantly less than those of control group, the nursing satisfaction rate of observation group was higher than that of control group, with statistically significant difference (P〈0.01). Conclusions Emergency nursing pathway has satisfactory effect in ACS patients treated with PCI, which is worthy of promotion in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222