不同类型轨道交通站点步行与电动自行车接驳分析  

Access analysis for pedestrian and electric bicycle to different types of rail transit stations

作　　者：李辉[1] 王东炜[1] 赵湘育[1] 严亚丹[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学土木工程学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《铁道科学与工程学报》2015年第6期1493-1499,共7页Journal of Railway Science and Engineering

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278468;51408552)

摘　　要：明确轨道交通站点的合理接驳范围可以有效提高其运行效率和扩大其吸引范围。以郑州市地铁1号线为例,考虑周边土地利用性质、站点区位等因素,将其沿线站点分为6种类型。结合RP（Revealed Preference）问卷调查,统计分析不同类型站点出行目的和接驳交通方式特征。采用距离衰减模型,计算得到对应于不同类型站点的步行接驳时间和距离,以及电动自行车的接驳时间和距离。研究结果表明：各类型站点的步行和电动自行车的接驳范围有所区别,其对于步行和电动自行车接驳时间的敏感度呈现一定的递增或递减性。且电动自行车的接驳范围为自行车接驳距离的2.6~4倍,接驳时间为其1.4~1.5倍。在进行轨道交通接驳方式分析时宜将电动自行车独立于自行车交通方式进行探讨。Reasonable feeder range of urban rail transit stations can improve their operational efficiency and expand attraction scope. Firstly,the paper classifies the stations of Zhengzhou Metro Line 1 as 6 categories based on land use,site of stations and other factors. Then the characteristics of trip purpose and connection modes of different station types are studied by using Revealed Preference Survey. Finally the distance decay model is used to analyze accessing time and distance of pedestrian and electric bicycle to different station types. Results show that： feeder range of pedestrian and electric bicycle is distinguishing depending on station types,and the accessing time sensitivity of pedestrian and electric bicycle represents increasing or decreasing property based on station types. The accessing distance of electric bicycles is 2. 6 to 4 times of bicycles＇,and accessing time is 1. 4 to 1. 5times of bicycles＇. Hence,electric bicycle should be discussed separately while analyzing the connection mode of rail transit.

关 键 词：轨道交通 站点类型 步行和电动自行车 接驳时间 接驳距离 

分 类 号：U491.1[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]