检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青岛市口腔医院,山东266000 [2]滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院,山东264000
出 处:《中华口腔正畸学杂志》2015年第4期188-191,共4页Chinese Journal of Orthodontics
基 金:青岛市卫生局资助课题(2014-WJZD142)
摘 要:目的 利用CBCT测量分析成人下颌体横截面的相关形态学指征,比较骨性Ⅲ类和骨性Ⅰ类下颌体横截面的相关指标的差异.方法 选取青岛市口腔医院就诊的骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)18例患者,骨性Ⅰ类错(牙合)16例患者,年龄18~33岁,平均24.5岁.均拍摄CBCT,测量右侧下颌体7个截面的牙齿倾斜度、下颌体截面倾斜度和根尖牙槽骨唇舌侧厚度,对结果进行独立样本t检验.结果 ①骨性Ⅲ类在前牙区和磨牙区牙齿倾斜度较骨性Ⅰ类大(P<0.05);②骨性Ⅲ类与骨性Ⅰ类下颌体截面倾斜度在各个区域无统计学的差异;③骨性Ⅲ类前牙区根尖唇侧牙槽骨厚度(下颌中切牙平均(2.30±0.39)mm较骨性Ⅰ类平均(3.75±1.31)mm)薄(P<0.05),根尖舌侧牙槽骨厚度(下颌中切牙平均(4.75±0.45)mm较骨性Ⅰ类平均(4.03±0.45)mm厚(P<0.05).结论 通过CBCT分析比较,骨性Ⅲ类较骨性Ⅰ类在下颌体横截面的某些形态特征具有明显差异,在临床正畸与正颌外科时应注意这些差异.Objective The study was to analyze features of mandibular body cross-sections in skeletal Class Ⅲ and Class Ⅰ malocclusion adult patients using CBCT and to compare morphology differences between them.Methods 18 patients with Class Ⅲ malocclusion and 16 patients with Class Ⅰ malocclusion were selected (18~33 years of age with a mean of 24.5 years old).Their CBCT images were taken and measured the following indicators in 7 different cross-sections of the right mandibular body: tooth angulation, angle of the mandibular body in cross-sections and labial or lingual alveolar bone thickness at the root apex.Statistical tests were performed using independent samples t-test.Results 1.Tooth angulation in posterior region was larger in skeletal Class Ⅲ than in skeletal Class Ⅰ (P〈0.05) 2.The angle of mandibular body in cross-sections was not statistically significant in two groups.3.For skeletal Class Ⅲ, thickness of the labial alveolar bone at the root apex in anterior tooth region (2.30±0.39) mm for lower lateral incisor was thicker than those in skeletal Class Ⅰ (3.75±1.31) mm, and thickness of the lingual alveolar bone at the root apex in anterior tooth region (4.75±0.45) mm for lower lateral incisor is thinner than those in skeletal Class Ⅰ (4.03± 0.45) mm(P〈0.05).Conclusions Mandibular body cross-sections between adult skeletal Class Ⅲ and Class Ⅰ patients has significant differences in some aspects, which should be taken care in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248