3M流动树脂与3M玻璃离子修复乳磨牙Ⅱ类洞的临床疗效比较  

Clinical Comparison of 3M Flowable Resin and 3M Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Molars ClassⅡ Cavity

作　　者：谢妮娜[1,2] 宋文婷[1] 魏路明 刘宗响[2] 

机构地区：[1]徐州医学院口腔医学院儿童牙病科,江苏徐州221004 [2]徐州医学院附属徐州口腔医院,江苏徐州221004

出　　处：《口腔医学研究》2015年第12期1206-1208,共3页Journal of Oral Science Research

基　　金：江苏省高校自然科学基金资助项目(编号:10KJB320026)

摘　　要：目的：探索儿童口腔科2种常用充填材料用于乳磨牙邻牙合面龋洞（Ⅱ类洞）充填治疗的临床疗效。方法：将178名4-6岁儿童266颗乳磨牙Ⅱ类洞随机分为2组,即3M流动树脂组（实验A组）、3M玻璃离子组（对照B组）,对乳磨牙进行充填治疗后1、2年复查比较2种材料治疗的临床疗效。结果：采用3M流动树脂和3M玻璃离子对Ⅱ类洞进行充填治疗后1年成功率分别为96.00%和87.80%,充填治疗后2年成功率分别为95.76%和86.61%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：3M流动树脂用于乳磨牙邻牙合面龋洞充填治疗的临床效果优于3M玻璃离子。Objective：To explore the clinical effect of dental filling materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry on the restoration of mesial or distal occlusal surface cavities（classⅡcavity）in primary molars.Methods：266primary molars with classⅡ cavities among 178 children aged 4-6were randomly divided into two groups,namely,the 3Mflowable resin group（experimental group）and 3Mglass ionomer group（matched group）.The clinical effect of two materials was compared after 1and 2years of treatment.Results：Treatment success rates of 3Mflowable composite resin and 3Mglass ionomer for classⅡ cavities were 96.00% and 87.80%respectively after 1year.After 2years,the rates were 95.76%and 86.61%respectively（P〈0.05）.Conclusions：For classⅡcavity in primary molars,the clinical outcome of 3Mflowable composite resin is better than that of 3Mglass ionomer.

关 键 词：3M流动树脂 3M玻璃离子 Ⅱ类洞 

分 类 号：R783.1[医药卫生—口腔医学]