决策能力量表在军校学员中的初步修订  

The Revision of Adult Decision-making Competence in Chinese Young Cadets

作　　者：冯田[1] 彭家熙 张家喜[1] 霍倩倩[1] 肖玮[1] 

机构地区：[1]第四军医大学医学心理系,西安710032

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2015年第6期1028-1031,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：全军医学科技"十二五"重大项目"军人群体信息损伤预警与防护"(AWS13J003)资助

摘　　要：目的：开发适合中国文化环境的决策能力评估工具。方法：经决策能力量表版权所属机构授权,请有关专家对决策能力量表进行翻译及回译;选取军校学员420名,战士80名,进行验证性因素分析,另用剑桥赌博任务进行效标关联效度研究。结果：采用决策能力量表各分量表标准分进行验证性因素分析证实了6因子结构模型,与国外研究相一致。各分量表Cronbachα在0.625-0.840之间,间隔两个月的重测信度在0.44~0.78之间,各因素与总分的相关系数在0.437-0.689之间。效标关联效度研究发现,决策能力量表分数高低个体在剑桥赌博任务决策质量成绩以及风险调节能力成绩上差异显著。结论：修订后的决策能力量表在军校学员群体中应用具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为决策能力评价的测量工具。Objective： The purpose of this study was to development the decision making tools for Chinese and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese cadets. Methods： The Adult Decision-making Competence was authorized to translate into Chinese version, translation and back-translation,expert assessment were used to work out the Chinese version of A-DMC. Totally 500 young military personnels completed the A-DMC in two studies, in which 420 cadets and 80 soldiers were further asked to complete Cambridge Gamble Task. Results： The final version of A-DMC consisted of 134 items,which was divided into 6 factors. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that it had good construct validity. Pearson correlation between the factors and the whole inventory were between 0.437~0.689, P〈0.001. The Cronbach＇s α for the factors was between 0.625~0.840, P〈0.001. In addition, results also showed that the A-DMC suited for Chinese cadets. Conclusion：Both the reliability and validity of A-DMC met the criteria of psychometrics, and it can be used as a tool to assess Chinese young soldier decision making competence for the future researches.

关 键 词：决策 决策能力 因素分析 信效度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]