遮蔽与敞开:重述“两个口号”之争  

Cover and Open:The Dispute of "Two Slogans"

作　　者：禹权恒[1] 

机构地区：[1]信阳师范学院文学院,河南信阳464000

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2015年第6期42-46,共5页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"鲁迅与二十世纪中国研究"(11AZD066);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金"语言批评的社会历史向度研究"(13YJC751053)

摘　　要：20世纪30年代中后期,在中华民族处于生死存亡的危机时刻,周扬等人提出了"国防文学"的重要口号,以呼应瓦窑堡会议上中共要求建立国防政府的政策主张。之后,鲁迅等人提出了"民族革命战争的大众文学",意在弥补"国防文学"这一口号的部分缺憾。自此之后,他们在许多报刊杂志上围绕着"两个口号"展开了激烈论争,双方都从各自的认识立场出发,详细阐述了自己口号的正确性和合理性。实际上,作为左翼阵营内部的矛盾冲突,他们是在争夺革命文化阐释的领导权。In the late 1930s,the Chinese nation was in the crisis of life and death. Zhou Yang et al put forward the slogan of ＂national literature＂ in order to echo the Wayaobao Conference of Chinese Communist Party calling for the establishment of national defense policies. Afterwards,Lu Xun,who put forward the ＂popular literature of the National Revolutionary War＂,is intended to make up for the slogan ＂national defense literature＂. Since then,they launched a fierce debate in many newspapers and magazines around the ＂Two Slogans＂,both sides starting from their respective understanding of the position with detailed exposition of the correctness and rationality of their own. Conflict within the Left Wing was actually over the leading power in the fight for the revolutionary culture.

关 键 词：“国防文学” “民族革命战争的大众文学” 鲁迅 周扬 文化领导权 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]