检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]商丘市第一人民医院口腔科,河南商丘476100
出 处:《全科口腔医学电子杂志》2015年第9期6-7,共2页Electronic Journal of General Stomatology
摘 要:目的对两种牵引尖牙方法应用于口腔正畸排齐整平阶段的价值进行比较。方法选取我院2012年1月~2014年1月收治的口腔正畸患者66例作为研究对象,根据牵引尖牙方式的不同将其分为观察组与对照组,各33例。观察组采用轻弹力牵引法,对照组采用Lace-back牵引法,并对两组患者排齐后的尖牙旋转度、尖牙间宽度进行比较。结果治疗后,观察组的尖牙旋转度、尖牙间宽度均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论以轻弹力牵引法对口腔正畸患者进行排齐整平,对于患者牙列改善情况更为有利,值得临床推广。Objective The two methods for orthodontic traction canines neat row of flat stages value comparison. Methods Orthodontic patients were selected from our hospital in January 2012 to 2014 January 66 cases as the research object, according to the traction canines were divided into observation group and control group, 33 cases in each group. Observation group with light elastic traction method, the control group was treated with Lace-back traction, and the alignment of two groups of patients after canine rotation and intercanine width were compared. Results Canine rotation after the observation group were aligned, the width between the canine patients was significantly better than the control group, the difference was significant, statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion In light elastic traction method for orthodontic patients with neat rows of flat, for the improvement of the patient's dentition is more favorable, worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28