国内护理学领域高影响因子期刊中临床RCT文献的质量评价  

Quality evaluation on clinical RCT literatures in journals with high impact factors in domestic nursing field

作　　者：李锐臻[1] 韩世范[2] 程金莲[2] 朱瑞芳[2] 李育玲[2] 

机构地区：[1]山西职业技术学院 [2]山西医科大学第一医院

出　　处：《循证护理》2015年第3期101-105,共5页Chinese Evidence-Based Nursing

摘　　要：[目的]了解2010年-2015年国内护理领域临床随机对照试验研究(RCT)文献的质量水平。[方法]制定文献纳入及排除标准,在护理类期刊影响因子大于1的期刊中筛选文献,共纳入160篇。根据临床试验报告统一标准(consolidated standards of reporting trials,CONSORT)声明确定文献质量评价指标,共16项,进行文献质量的评价分析。[结果]评价指标中,纳入标准、排除标准、对照、基线资料、干预措施、观测指标及终点指标得到了很好的执行,其余指标的认知及执行情况欠佳。文献的整体质量不高,与RCT的规范要求有一定的差距。[结论]国内护理领域的RCT文献质量需进一步提高,以满足循证护理研究实践的需要。Objective：To know about the quality of clinical RCT literatures in domestic nursing field from 2010to2015.Methods：The inclusion and exclusion criteria of literatures were formulated,the literatures were screened from the periodicals with impact factor1 in nursing periodicals,and a total of 160 papers were included.According to the CONSORT statement to determine the literature quality evaluation index including a total of 16 items,the quality of literatures was evaluated and analyzed.Results：In the evaluation indexs,the inclusion criteria,exclusion criteria,control,baseline data,intervention measures,observation indexes and end indexes were well implemented,but the cognition and implementation of other indexes were poor.The overall quality of the literatures was poor,and there was a certain gap with the standard requirements of RCT.Conclusion：The quality of RCT research literatures in domestic nursing field need to be further improved,so as to meet the needs of evidence-based nursing research practice.

关 键 词：护理学期刊 临床随机对照试验研究 质量评价 影响因子 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]