腹腔镜下行食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术对食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流患者的临床疗效及并发症的影响  被引量:7

Effect and safety of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with fundoplication in hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:虞向阳 何艳舫 赵鹏 张国志 王长友 孙蕊 

机构地区:[1]华北理工大学附属医院普外科,河北省唐山市063000

出  处:《中国医药》2016年第1期67-71,共5页China Medicine

基  金:河北省科学技术研究与发展计划(112761135) Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Hebei Province

摘  要:目的探讨腹腔镜下行食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术对食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流患者的临床疗效及并发症的影响。方法选择2012年1月至2015年1月华北理工大学附属医院收治的食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流患者72例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各36例。对照组行常规开腹手术,观察组于腹腔镜下行食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术。比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、治疗前后的反流性疾病问卷(RDQ)各症状评分和消化病生存质量指数(GLQI)评分以及术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、胃肠道功能恢复时间及术后住院时间均明显少于对照组[(76±10)min比(95±12)min、(28±10)ml比(77±21)ml、(1.2±0.4)d比(3.6±1.0)d、(6.1±1.6)d比(11.9±2.4)d],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组与对照组患者治疗前RDQ各症状评分[胸痛:(4.73±2.31)分比(4.82±2.53)分,烧心:(6.13±2.43)分比(6.02±1.93)分,反酸:(4.29±2.12)分比(4.36±2.31)分,反食:(5.02±2.17)分比(5.13±2.62)分]和GLQI评分比较[自觉症状:(48.4±9.1)分比(49.0±8.9)分,生理功能状态:(15.3±5.1)分比(15.4±53)分,精神、心理状态:(12.3±4.2)分比(12.1±3.6)分,生活、社会状态:(8.9±2.5)分比(8.7±2.6)分,总评分:(84.5±12.5)分比(84.8±12.8)分],差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗后,2组患者RDQ各症状评分均明显低于治疗前,GLQI评分均明显高于治疗前,观察组患者的RDQ各症状评分明显低于对照组[胸痛:(1.04±0.22)分比(2.43±1.04)分,烧心:(1.44±0.62)分比(3.23±1.24)分,反酸:(1.25±0.57)分比(2.52±1.32)分,反食:(1.35±0.74)分比(2.68±1.01)分],GLQI评ObjectiveTo explore the effect and safety of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with fundoplication in hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. MethodsTotally 72 cases of patients with hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease from January 2012 to January 2015 were enrolled and randomly divided into control group (36 cases) receiving conventional laparotomy, and observation group (36 cases) receiving laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with fundoplication. The duration of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospitalization duration, reflux diagnostic questionnaire (RDQ) scores, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GLQI) scores and incidence of complications were compared between groups. ResultsThe duration of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time of gastrointestinal function after operation and hospitalization duration in observation group were significantly less than those in control group [(76±10) min vs (95±12) min, (28±10) ml vs (77±21) ml, (1.2±0.4) d vs (3.6±1.0) d, (6.1±1.6) d vs (11.9±2.4) d] (P〈0.05). Before treatment, observation group and control group were not significantly different regarding the RDQ scores [pectoralgia: (4.73±2.31) scores vs (4.82±2.53) scores, heartburn: (6.13±2.43) scores vs (6.02±1.93) scores, sour regurgitation: (4.29±2.12) scores vs (4.36±2.31) scores, gastroesophageal reflux: (5.02±2.17) scores vs (5.13±2.62) scores] and GLQI scores [subjective symptom: (48.4±9.1) scores vs (49.0±8.9) scores, physiological function state: (15.3±5.1) scores vs (15.4±5.3) scores, mental state: (12.3±4.2) scores vs (12.1±3.6) scores, social status: (8.9±2.5) scores vs (8.7±2.6) scores, total GLQI scores: (84.5±12.5) scores vs (84.8±12.8) scores] (P〉0.05). After treatment, the RDQ scores were si

关 键 词: 食管裂孔 胃食管反流 食管裂孔疝修补术 胃底折叠术 

分 类 号:R571[医药卫生—消化系统]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象