“六经皆史”说的理学渊源及其意蕴  

The Neo- Confucianism Origin and Implication of the Theory that Six Confucian Classics are all Historical Works

作　　者：刘雄伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《史学集刊》2016年第1期90-95,127,共7页Collected Papers of History Studies

基　　金：吉林大学基本科研业务费种子基金项目"‘六经皆史’研究"(2012BS054)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：章学诚的"六经皆史"说只有诉诸理学的语境才能获得完全的理解。程朱理学在道器的层面区分了形上之经学与形下之史学,内在地割裂了经、史的关系,最终导致理学末流空谈心性的学术流弊。从史学史上看,理学自发端以来所倡导的"经以载道"及"经本史末"不仅没有影响史学的发展,反而促成了史学的理学化转型。史学的理学化不仅在史学实践方面形成了宋代史著别具一格的理学特色,而且还在史学理论方面衍生出明代王世贞的"《六经》,史之言理者也"以及清人章学诚的"六经皆史"。章学诚的"六经皆史"说通过对"六经皆先王之政典"的系统阐释,打破了理学家"经以载道"的观念,开启了以史明道的新路向。通过追踪经、史关系自理学以来的演变过程,本文最终厘清了章学诚"六经皆史"的理学渊源及其真实意蕴。Zhang Xuecheng＇s（章学诚） theory that six Confucian Classics are all historical works can be only understood fully in the context of Neo- Confucianism. Neo- Confucianism differentiated the study of Confucian classics from historiography,split inherently the relationship between classics and history and caused finally the academic malpractice in which the last followers of Confucianism talked about mind emptily. From the history of historiography,the notion that classics is for explaining the reason,classics is primary and history is secondary which initiated by Neo- Confucianism since its beginning had no effect on the development of historiography,on the contrary it facilitated the transformation of historiography to Neo- Confucianismization,which not only endowed the historical works of Song Dynasty with the unique characteristics of Neo- Confucianism,but also derived Wang Shizhen＇s（王世贞） claim that the six Confucian Classics were the historical works that talked about reason,and Zhang Xuecheng＇s（章学诚） assertion that six Confucian Classics are all historical works. Zhang Xuecheng＇s theory opened a new way to use history for illuminating the reason.

关 键 词：理学 六经 史学 章学诚 

分 类 号：K206[历史地理—历史学] B244[历史地理—中国史]