《诗》≠“声”:“郑声淫”与“诗无邪”管窥  

Poetry is not Song: Songs in Zheng Country is lascivious,and Poetry is Innocent

作　　者：杨殿斛 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学音乐学院,江苏扬州225009

出　　处：《艺术百家》2015年第6期189-196,共8页Hundred Schools In Arts

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学项目"‘宫调学’理论体系研究"(项目编号:12YJA760039)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：孔子云:"《诗三百》,一言以蔽之,曰:‘思无邪’"(《论语·为政》),孔子又云:"放郑声,远佞人,郑声淫,佞人殆"(《论语·阳货》),再云:"恶紫之夺朱也,恶郑声之乱雅乐也"(《论语·卫灵公》)。《诗》有《郑风》,郑风出郑声,前《郑风》为"诗",后"郑风"为俗,因《论语》中有孔子云《诗经》"思无邪"与说为政"郑声淫"的判语,似有相悖之嫌,遂形成后世聚讼两千余年的文化公案。窃以为《毛诗序》始作俑者,是人皆《郑风》谓"郑声"之误,即孔子删《诗》《书》,订《礼》《乐》,修《春秋》,所云之"诗"与"声"有别,"郑诗"非"郑声",声有淫而《诗》无邪。Confucius said： ＂as regards to Classic of Poetry, we could sum it up in a word, that is to say the poetry is innocent. ＂ He also said： ＂wetl better be far away from Zheng songs like wed better be far away from snobs. And I hate that Zheng songs makes elegant music in disorder. ＂ These discourses seem inconsistent and thus form a cultural case for critics to debate and to discuss for two thousand years. In my opinion, the ＂ preface for the Classic of Poetry＂ is the initiator of evil, but in fact, there are differences between poetry and song, and Zheng poetry is not Zheng song, since songs in Zheng Country is lascivious, but poetry is innocent.

关 键 词：音乐艺术 中国传统文化 诗经 论语 孔子 艺术理论 诗无邪 郑声淫 

分 类 号：J60[艺术—音乐]