检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学经济学院,上海200433 [2]上海财经大学国际工商管理学院,上海200433 [3]常熟理工学院数学与统计学院,江苏常熟215500
出 处:《当代经济科学》2016年第1期97-107,127-128,共11页Modern Economic Science
基 金:上海财经大学研究生创新基金项目(CXJJ-2015-328)
摘 要:员工培训投入并非多多益善。本文利用广义倾向得分匹配的方法,评估了员工培训投入对企业生产率的作用,发现:(1)培训投入与企业生产率呈"倒N形"关系,即随着培训投入的增加,企业生产率呈"下降-上升-下降"趋势;从而,数额较小或数额过大的培训投入都是无效的,不会提升企业效率,存在最优的员工培训投入。(2)该结论在两种效率指标下(劳动生产率和全要素生产率)和三种分类子样本下(按地区、行业和所有制分类)均是稳健的。(3)但是,员工培训投入的处理效应与最优规模在不同的子样本中是有差异的。Employees' training input is not the more the better. Based on the generalized propensity score matching method,this paper evaluates the roles played by employees' training input in corporate productivity and finds that:( 1) a reverse N-shaped relationship exists between training input and corporate productivity,that is,with the rise of training input,corporate productivity has the trend of 'rise-fall-rise'. Thus,relativelysmall or large amount of training input is invalid. The corporate efficiency can't be raised and there is no optimal employees' training input.( 2) These conclusions are robust under two kinds of efficiency indicators( i.e. labor productivity and total factor productivity) and under three subsamples( i. e. classified by region,industry and ownership).( 3) But the treatment effects and the optimal scale of employees' training input are different in different subsamples.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200