检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市第七人民医院消化内科,重庆400054
出 处:《转化医学电子杂志》2015年第10期26-27,共2页E-Journal of Translational Medicine
摘 要:目的:探究数字化音乐电胃肠起搏治疗仪治疗胃肠动力紊乱性疾病的临床疗效.方法:将300例胃肠动力紊乱性疾病患者随机分为治疗组(n=150)和对照组(n=150).对照组给予药物常规治疗,治疗组在其基础上加用数字化音乐电胃肠起搏治疗仪治疗,观察治疗前后两组患者症状改善情况.结果:对照组治疗后症状评分(7.23±2.01)较治疗前(22.85±2.34)下降;治疗组治疗后症状评分(4.34±1.32)较治疗前(23.13±2.27)明显下降,且治疗组总有效率(94.7%)较对照组(76.7%)明显升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:采用体表数字化音乐电胃肠起搏治疗仪治疗胃肠动力紊乱性疾病能够有效地改善患者的症状,值得在临床中广泛应用.AIM: To explore the clinical effects on digital music electrical gastrointestinal pacing apparatus in the treatment of disorders of gastrointestinal motility. METHODS: A total of 300 cases of patients with gastrointestinal disorders were randomly divided into treatment group and control group,with 150 cases in each group. The control group was given conventional drug,while the treatment group was given digital music electrical gastrointestinal pacing apparatus on the basis of conventional drug treatment. The improvement of symptoms before and after treatment in two groups were observed. RESULTS: The symptom scores after treatment in the control group( 7. 23 ± 2. 01) were lower than that before treatment( 22. 85 ± 2. 34); while the symptom scores after treatment in the treatment group( 4. 34±1. 32) were significantly lower than that before treatment( 23. 13 ±2. 27). The total effective rate in treatment group( 94. 70%) was significantly higher than that( 76. 70%) in the control group,with statistically significant difference( P〈0. 05). CONCLUSION: The digital music electrical gastrointestinal pacing apparatus in the treatment of disorders of gastrointestinal motility can effectively improve the symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders,which is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112