非财产性权利:农村宅基地的属性与价值辨析  

Beyond property rights:discrimination of the characteristics and values of rural residential land

作　　者：魏程琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学中国乡村治理研究中心,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期229-236,共8页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金一等资助项目(2013M540585)

摘　　要：宅基地使用权能否自由流转并非是单纯的经济或私人权利问题。宅基地的自然、社会和政治法律等多重属性决定宅基地是非完整商品,不能自由流转。95%的农村宅基地由于不具备交易的市场和条件而没有交换价值,因而,即使放开宅基地使用权自由流转也不能增加农民财产性收入。在实践中,农民和国家分别基于长远生计保障和社会稳定的考虑,共同选择了作为保障性权利而非财产性权利的宅基地使用权。综上可以得出,我国政府坚持限制宅基地使用权流转无疑是明智稳妥之举。Whether the using right of residential land could be freely transacted is not a purely economical or private issue. The multiple characteristics of rural residential land such as nature, social and political and legal characteristics decide it is not a complete commodity, so it could not be freely transacted. In fact, 95% of the rural residential land has no exchange value, therefore, the rural residential land could not increase farmers＇ property income if there is no limitations on the transaction. In practice, the farmers with the consideration of long-term livelihood security and the government, the social stability, jointly chose the security rights rather than the property rights on land use right. It is concluded that the central government＇s insistence on the restrictions on rural residential land transaction is wise and reliable undoubtedly.

关 键 词：农村宅基地 宅基地使用权 性质 价值 非财产性权利 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]