检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年第6期96-101,共6页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"刑法社会化研究"(11BFX109);江苏省哲学社会科学基金项目"社会变迁与刑事政策研究"(12FXB005)
摘 要:刑法理论界和实务界对危险方法类型和范围的探讨,表明了对待以危险方法危害公共安全罪的基本立场,即限制解释"危险方法",以防范此罪成为兜底性的罪名,违反刑法的明确性,但是并没有提供认定危险方法的具体判断法则。通过对司法实践中相关判决的梳理,可以发现,公共安全的认定不宜过于宽泛,尤其应提防将公共秩序置换为公共安全。在危险方法判断上,可从社会公众的价值判断、行为客观的附随状况以及行为实施的方式等多方面综合判断。既不能过度泛化对本罪的理解,也不能一概地适用其他领域中犯罪的罪名而排斥以危险方法危害公共安全罪的适用。The exploration of the method of risk type and scope in the circle of the criminal law theory and practice show that the basic stance of the crime,which limits the interpretation of "dangerous method",in order to prevent the crime become security charge,a clear violation of criminal law. However,there is no specific judgment rule for determining the risk. Through the judicial practice of the relevant decisions of the comb,you can find that public security is not too broad,especially on the public order of the public security. In the judgment of the dangerous method,the judgment of the value of the public,the objective of the action and the way of the behavior can be judged. We can not over generalization of the understanding of this crime; it can not be applied to other areas of crime and the exclusion of the application of the crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235