检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王松[1] 包铮[1] 沈严严[2] 胡聂[1] 罗平[1] 蒋忠军[1] 刘瑛[2] 申兴平
机构地区:[1]南华大学附属南华医院甲乳肿瘤外科,衡阳421002 [2]南华大学附属南华医院超声科,衡阳421002
出 处:《中国微创外科杂志》2016年第1期13-16,共4页Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
基 金:湖南省教育厅科技项目(14C0997)
摘 要:目的探讨气/液造影技术在超声引导下乳腺肿瘤微创旋切术中的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析我院2013年1月~2015年1月超声引导下乳腺肿瘤微创旋切术620例1436个肿瘤的资料,按不同医生分组,其中气/液造影组308例,普通显像组312例,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、美容满意度评分,以及血肿、术后1个月仍感疼痛、肿瘤复发/残留的发生率。结果 2组血肿、术后1个月仍感疼痛、肿瘤复发/残留发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。气/液造影组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间和术后6个月美容满意度评分均优于普通显像组[(20.8±4.2)min vs.(35.9±3.1)min,t=-50.881,P=0.000;(5.0±0.4)ml vs.(10.2±0.8)ml,t=-102.559,P=0.000;(48.6±0.5)h vs.(72.3±0.2)h,t=-761.176,P=0.000;(4.8±0.1)分vs.(4.2±0.2)分,t=46.460,P=0.000]。结论与普通显像相比,气/液造影技术应用于超声引导下乳腺肿瘤微创旋切术具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、恢复快、美容效果更好等优势,且支持黑白超声、一人操作手术模式。Objective To investigate the clinical value of gas/liquid contrast radiography in ultrasound-guided vacuumassisted minimally invasive breast biopsy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed documents of 1436 breast lesions from 620 cases,who were treated with ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted minimally invasive breast biopsy in our hospital from January 2013 to January2015. Among them,308 cases were given gas / liquid contrast radiography and 312 cases were given traditional imaging. The operative time,blood loss,hospital stay,cosmetic scores,as well as incidence of hematoma,postoperative pain after one month,recurrent /residual tumor were compared between the two groups. Results No significant differences between the two groups were found in incidence of hematoma,postoperative pain after one month,and recurrent / residual tumor( P〉0. 05). The operative time,blood loss,hospital stay,and cosmetic scores 6 months after the surgery in the gas / liquid radiography group were significantly better than those in the traditional imaging group [( 20. 8 ± 4. 2) min vs.( 35. 9 ± 3. 1) min,t =- 50. 881,P = 0. 000;( 5. 0 ± 0. 4) ml vs.( 10. 2 ±0. 8) ml,t =- 102. 559,P = 0. 000;( 48. 6 ± 0. 5) h vs.( 72. 3 ± 0. 2) h,t =- 761. 176,P = 0. 000;( 4. 8 ± 0. 1) points vs.( 4. 2 ± 0. 2) points,t = 46. 460,P = 0. 000]. Conclusion As compared to traditional imaging,the gas/liquid contrast radiography has shorter operative time,less blood loss,faster recovery,better cosmetic results and other advantages,feasible to black-and-white ultrasound device and single operator mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222