性别、文本和建构论的局限  

Gender,Text and the Limits of the Constructivism

作　　者：郑鸿升[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学外国语学院,上海200240

出　　处：《福建师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第1期83-87,103,共6页Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：性别和文本有什么联系呢?建构论认为二者都是建构出来的;性别是由社会建构的,文本是由文化建构的,二者都没有本质。在西方文论界,建构论——比如朱迪斯·巴特勒的性别理论、新历史主义和文化唯物主义——影响巨大。这种背景下,美国学者查尔斯·谢泼德森巧妙地运用拉康精神分析学中的真实界概念,指出建构论的不足。他把真实界分为象征界之前的真实界和象征界之后的真实界。谢泼德森拥护后一种版本的真实界,但同时强调象征界的局限性。这样,即使谢泼德森最终接受了建构论,也没有对其盲目崇拜,而是从新的角度强调其局限性,彰显了自己与众不同的观点。Why are gender and text put together According to the constructivism,both of them are constructed,without any essence. Gender is socially constructed and text is culturally constructed. Constructivism,such as Judith Butler' s theory on gender,New Historicism and Cultural Materialism,is currently paramount in the Western literary theory. Facing this situation,the Lacanian scholar Charles Shepherdson proposes that we should pay more attention to the limits of constructivism by distinguishing between the pre-symbolic real and post-symbolic real and emphasizing the limits of the symbolic order.

关 键 词：社会建构论 新历史主义 文化唯物主义 查尔斯·谢泼德森 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]