检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《管理评论》2016年第1期31-41,共11页Management Review
基 金:浙江省社会科学规划课题成果(14NDJC196YB);国家自然科学基金项目(71302125);教育部人文社科项目(13YJC630032);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ13G020016)
摘 要:基于国内外文献探讨了质量管理基础实践和核心实践对企业绩效的影响,从组织学习视角揭示上述两者关系的内在作用机制,并构建了相应的理论模型。以浙江省11个地级市424家制造企业为实证样本检验相关假设,研究结果表明:(1)质量管理基础实践和核心实践不仅对企业绩效有直接正向作用,而且两者的协同项正向影响企业绩效,两者的匹配项对绩效有显著负向作用;(2)基础实践通过探索性学习和利用性学习对企业绩效产生间接影响,而核心实践仅通过利用性学习对企业绩效产生影响。研究对制造企业如何实施质量管理实践及实现质量升级具有管理上的启示意义。The influence of quality management infrastructure practices and core practices on firm performance is analyzed based on literature review, in which organizational learning plays a mediator role. A theoretical model including quality management practice (QMP) , organizational learning and finn performance is testified by using the data from 424 manufacturing firms of Zhejiang province. The results indicate that not only infrastructure practices and core practices have direct positive impact on firm performance, but also their interacting and matching terms have direct effects. Moreover, both explorative learning and exploitative learning mediate infrastructure practices and firm performance, while only exploitative learning indirectly influences the relationship between core practices and firm performance. Managerial implications for manufacturing firms as to how to implement QMP and achieve quality upgrading are provided according to research findings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69