检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学化学教育研究所
出 处:《化学教育》2016年第3期5-8,共4页Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
基 金:全国教育科学“十一五”规划教育部重点课题(DHA100252);东北师范大学教师教育研究基金项目(DSJSJY2009103);吉林省教育厅“十二五”规划课题(GH0089)
摘 要:基于教学行为视角,依据课堂教学系统CPUP模型理论和课堂教学基元系统有效性评价量表,通过对24位男女化学教师的24节常态课堂中基元系统有效性进行对比分析。结果发现,男女教师的主要差别表现为:在"时间利用的合理性"和"匹配度"2个维度上,女教师显著高于男教师;在"教学行为链实施质量"和"资源和技术的使用质量"2个维度上,男教师显著高于女教师;而在总分和"基元内容的合理性"维度上,2者不存在显著差异。Based on the perspective of instructional behavior,using the CPUP model theory and the instrument of assessing the effectiveness of primitive system in chemistry classroom teaching,this study analyzed 24 ordinary lessons which were taught by 12 male teachers and 12 female teachers.We found that the main differences of teaching chemistry between male and female teachers were:the performance of female teachers were significantly better than male teachers in the dimension of rationality of teaching time(RTT)and match degree(MD);whereas,the performance of male teachers were significantly better than female teachers in the dimension of the quality of teaching behavior chain(QTBC)and the quality of using resource and technology(QURT);However,there were no significant differences on the total score and the dimension of rationality of primitive content(RPrC).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.184.32