检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院西苑医院肾内科,北京100091
出 处:《生物医学工程与临床》2016年第1期71-75,共5页Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨腹膜透析对肝肾综合征的治疗效果,比较两种透析方式的优劣。方法选取中国中医科学院西苑医院2006年12月至2015年3月符合肝肾综合征的患者20例,其中男性16例,女性4例,平均年龄53.15岁。采用美国Baxter公司生产的腹膜透析管进行腹膜透析治疗,分为置管后立即行持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)组(A组)9例和间断放腹水组(B组)11例。比较两组治疗前后的近期肝肾功能、尿量、白蛋白变化情况,以及两组患者远期生存时间和腹膜炎发生情况。结果近期疗效,两组患者的尿量在治疗后均显著增加,残肾的尿素清除指数(KT/V治疗前后,A组0.57±0.12 vs 1.24±0.40,B组0.51±0.09 vs 1.30±0.39)、肌酐清除率(Ccr治疗前后,A组11.34±6.32 vs 68.89±16.82,B组10.87±5.56 vs72.32±17.12)均明显改善,两组肾功能均明显恢复,B组白蛋白提高更明显,电解质紊乱得到纠正。远期疗效,两组平均生存时间均达到1.5年,但B组生存时间长于A组(P<0.01)。A组患者的腹膜炎发生率为1/6.43患者月,B组为1/29.80患者月,A组明显高于B组;A组大部分患者在置管半年内发生腹膜炎。结论腹膜透析是缓解肝肾综合征的有效治疗手段,采用先放腹水,再行CAPD的方式似乎更有效。Objective To investigate the effect of peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome, and compare the efficacy between 2 types of dialysis. Methods From December 2006 to March 2015, a total of 20 patients with hepatorenal syndrome were enrolled, which included 16 males and 4 females with mean age of 53.15 years old. All of the patients performed peritoneal dialysis with intraperitoneal catheter by Baxter Co. All of them were divided into 2 groups, group A(n = 9) treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and group B (n = 11) treated with intraperitoneal catheter to drain ascites persistently. The changes of liver and kidney function, urine volume and albumin'before and after treatment between 2 groups were compared, long-term survival and peritonitis rate were observed. Results After treatment, urine volumes in 2 groups significantly increased, urea clearance index of residual kidney[KT/V, before and .after treatment in group A(0.57 ± 0.12 vs 1.24 ± 0.40) and group B(0.51±0.09 vs 1.30 ±0.39)], creatinine clearance rate[Ccr, before and after treatment in group A(11.34 ± 6.32 vs 68.89 ± 16.82) and group B (10.87 ± 5.56 vs 72.32 ±17.12)] were significantly improved, the renal function of 2 groups were significantly restored, albumin of group B increased more apparently and electrolyte disorder was corrected. In long-term curative effect, mean survival time reached 1.5 years in 2 groups, but survival time of group B was longer than that of group A(P 〈 0.01). The peritonitis rates was 1/6,43 in group A and group B of 1/29.80, which was higher than that in group B, and majority patients of group A suffered peritonitis within six-month catheterization. Conclusion It is demonstrated that peritoneal dialysis is the effective treatment of hepatorenal syndrome, which performs CAPD after paracentesis could be more valid.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117