检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:聂二民[1] 姜瑞[1] 张春元[1] 曾尽娣 谈济州
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院口腔科,广州510080
出 处:《中华生物医学工程杂志》2015年第5期428-431,共4页Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基 金:广东省科技厅社会发展项目(20118080701010、20128061700066)
摘 要:目的检测使用不同牌号钕铁硼永磁体制作的磁性附着体的磁力和磁感应强度。方法选取牌号分别为N45、N48、N50、N52的4种钕铁硼永磁体,采用闭路磁场中的“杯型”结构制作磁性附着体,按永磁体牌号不同分为4组:A(N45)组、B(N48)组、C(N50)组、D(N52)组,以MagfitDX800磁性附着体作为对照(E组),每组10对。测试并记录每组磁性附着体的磁力和磁感应强度。结果A组、B组、C组、D组、E组磁性附着体实际测量的磁力值分别为(330.83±26.43)gf、(376.17±25.67)gf、(428.87±30.44)gf、(489.30±28.27)gf、(418.53±28.76)gf(1gf=9.8mN),总体差异具有统计学意义(F=135.424,P〈0.001)。采用LSD检验两两比较显示,D组磁性附着体的磁力最大,与其他4组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.001);A组磁性附着体的磁力最小,与其余4组组间比较,差异均具有统计学意义(均P〈0.001);B组磁力大于A组,小于C、D、E组(均P〈0.001);C组与E组间的磁力差异无统计学意义(P=0.155)。各组磁性附着体外表面的磁感应强度均小于400G,符合磁场泄露安全标准。结论新型磁性附着体选用钕铁硼N52作为永磁体材料,可明显提高磁性附着体的磁力,有望广泛应用于临床。Objective To determine the magnetic force and magnetic induction intensity of attachments made of NdFeB permanent magnets with different grades. Methods The 4 types of magnetic attachments were included in the study, and divided into 4 groups (A, B, C, D) based on different grades of NdFeB permanent magnets (N45, N48, N50, N52), respectively; the MagfitDXSO0 magnetic attachment was included in the control group (E) (n=10 pairs each). All magnetic attachments were structured by cup- shape in the closed magnetic field. The magnetic force and magnetic induction intensity of magnetic attachments in each group were measured and recorded. Results The actually measured magnetic force of the magnetic attachments in groups A, B, C, D and E were (330.83±26.43) gf, (376.17±25.67) gf, (428.87±30.44) gf, (489.30±28.27) gf, (418.53±28.76) gf(1 gf=9.8 mN), respectively, with overall statistical difference among groups (F=135.424, P〈0.001 ). When all the groups were compared in pairs and determined by LSD test, the maximum magnetic force of the magnetic attachment was found in group D, with statistically significant difference compared with the other 4 groups (all P〈0.001 ) ; the minimum magnetic force of the magnetic attachment was found in group A, with statistically significant difference compared with the other 4 groups (all P〈0.001 ) ; the magnetic force in group B was stronger than that in group A but weaker than those in groups C, D and E (all P〈0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the magnetic force between groups C and E (P=0.155). The magnetic induction intensity of the magnetic attachment surface in each group was less than 400 G, which was consistent with the safety standards of magnetic leakage. Conclusion The new magnetic attachments made of NdFeB N52 as the permanent magnetic material can significantly improve the magnetic force of the magnetic attachments, and is promising for widespread use in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3