检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东中医药大学,山东济南250014 [2]山东大学附属千佛山医院,山东济南250014
出 处:《医学检验与临床》2015年第6期57-59,共3页Medical Laboratory Science and Clinics
摘 要:目的:统计2010—2014年山东省34家重症医学科(ICU)临床分离非发酵菌分布及耐药性,分析非发酵菌感染情况及耐药特点,指导临床合理应用抗生素。方法:采用扩散法或稀释法进行药物敏感性试验,结果以CLSI标准判读。结果:2010—2014年共分离病原菌50219株,其中非发酵菌25856株,鲍氏不动杆菌11875株,铜绿假单胞菌11687株,嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌1945株,洋葱伯克霍尔德菌549株。监测结果示鲍氏不动杆菌对所有抗生素耐药率均大于30%,但对米诺环素和头孢哌/酮舒巴坦保持相对较低耐药性。2010年鲍氏不动杆菌对美罗培南和亚胺培南耐药率分别为78.7%和80.0%,2014年上升至90.8%和91.2%。鲍氏不动杆菌整体耐药水平较高且呈升高趋势。铜绿假单胞菌对阿米卡星耐药率小于30%,对其他抗生素耐药率均大于30%,对阿米卡星、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦、左氧氟沙星耐药率相对较低。2010年铜绿假单胞菌对美罗培南和亚胺培南耐药率分别为50.9%和50.8%,2014年下降至36.1%和45.1%。铜绿假单胞菌总体耐药水平明显低于鲍氏不动杆菌。嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌对米诺环素、左氧氟沙星、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦耐药率均小于30%。洋葱伯克霍尔德菌对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦、头孢他啶、美罗培南、左氧氟沙星耐药率均小于30%。结论:山东省重症医学科临床分离病原菌中,非发酵菌检出率高,耐药性强。Objective : To investigate the bacterial resistance to non-fermentative grams from 34 hospitals in Shandong Province from the Intensive Care Unit during 2010-2014. Methods : The antimicrobial susceptibility was tested according to an agreed protocol using Kirby-Bauer method. Data were analyzed according to CLSI.Results : A total of 50219 clinical isolates of pathogens, including 25856 non-fermentative grams:Acinetobacter baumannii (n=11875) ; Pseudomonas aemginosa (n=11687) ; Stenotrophomonas maltophiha ( n=1945 ) ; Brukholderia cepacia ( n=549 ) .Acinetobacter baumannii to Meropenem and Imipenem resistance rates were 78.7% and 80.0% in 2010, raising to 90.8% and 91.2% in 2014.The resistance rate to all antibacterials was more than 30% while to Minocycline and Cefoperazine-sulbactam is relatively acceptable.Pseudomonas aemginosa to Meropenem and Imipenem resistance rates were 50.9% and 50.8% in 2010,down to 90.8% and 91.2% in 2014.The resistance rate to Amikacin was less than 30%,to other antibacterials was more than 30%, and to Amikacin , Cefoperazine-sulbactam and Levofloxacin was relatively acceptable.Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Minocycline, Levofloxacin and Cefoperazine-sulbactam were less than 30%.Burkholderia cepacia to Piperacillin-tazobactam, Cefoperazine-sulbactam, Ceftazidime, Meropenem and Levofloxacin resistance rates were less than 30%. Conclusions : The changes of antibiotic resistance differ from the species of bacteria and antibiotics.Therefore this article is aimed at offer some reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3