非法证据排除范围界定的困境与出路——兼谈侦查讯问方法的改革  

Plight and way out for exclusionary rule of illegally obtained confession and a probe into reform of criminal interrogation models

作　　者：郭志媛[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《证据科学》2015年第6期645-652,共8页Evidence Science

摘　　要：2010年非法证据排除规定出台后,非法证据排除规则的适用范围就成为学界热议的焦点问题。2012年修正的刑事诉讼法仍未解决此问题,司法解释的界定也模糊不清,使得非法证据的范围及其界定标准等问题更加扑朔迷离。本文通过规范分析与实证研究指出当前非法证据排除范围界定上存在的问题,继而考察了美国法律中解决类似问题的经验与教训,从中得出若干启示。最后,笔者认为非法证据排除规则并不能从根本上遏制刑讯逼供和其他非法取证行为,深层次的改革应当指向侦查讯问方法的改革以及侦查讯问模式的整体转型。The scope of illegally obtained confession has become a hotly debated issue since the Exclusionary Rule of Evidence was promulgated in 2010. Unfortunately, the 2012 P.R.C. Criminal Procedure Law has not solved this problem, and the judicial interpretations are still unclear, making this issue more confusing and complicated. This article identifies the existing problems by means of normative analysis and empirical research, then explores the experience and lessons of the American law in dealing with the similar problems, and draws some enlightenment from them. In conclusion, the author holds that the exclusionary rule of evidence cannot eradicate torture and other illegal means of evidence collection, and there should be further reforms on the interrogation methods and interrogation models.

关 键 词：非法证据 排除范围 侦查讯问方法 讯问模式 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]