正义如何可能——论罗尔斯原初状态下的人  

How Justice May Be——On Rawls' People in the Original State of

作　　者：彭宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100080

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第1期50-57,共8页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：罗尔斯的正义理论接续的是社会契约的政治传统,由此也决定了罗尔斯的理论出发点与经典社会契约论者存在某些相似之处。原初状态的理论设想无疑是一个明显的例证。即使人们普遍相信一个公正的社会是可能的,但原初状态下的人是否会真地选择罗尔斯所说的正义原则并最终达到一种"作为公平的正义"?通过对罗尔斯设想的原初状态的深入剖析,我们将会发现,也许罗尔斯的这一假定过于理想化,难以为正义论的构建提供一个稳固的基点。Rawls＇ s Theory of Justice carries on the political tradition of social contract, which determines the similarity between the starting point of Rawls＇ s theory and the classical social contract theory. The theoretical assumption of the original state is undoubtedly an obvious example. Even though it is generally believed that a just society is possible, is it true that people in the original state can really choose the justice principles Rawls says and ultimately achieve a ＂fairness and justice＂ ？ A thorough analysis of the original state presumed by Rawls indicates that his assumption may be too idealistic and can hardly provide a solid basis for the construction of the theory of justice.

关 键 词：正义 罗尔斯 社会契约 原初状态下的人 

分 类 号：D903[政治法律—法学理论]