检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:兰荣杰[1]
出 处:《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第1期35-43,共9页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"优化审判权与审判管理权配置的理论和实践研究"(12CFX052);教育部留学归国人员启动基金项目"法院审判权配置与诉讼公正研究";"钱江人才计划"项目(QJC1202007)
摘 要:公开审判既是被告人的权利,也是社会公众的权利,甚至包含国家的诸多权力利益。综合权衡之下,刑事审判应以公开为原则,不公开为例外。在具体操作中,则以比例原则为核心,注意公正审判、公众知情权、被告人负担、政府利益等多元诉求的平衡。以此观之,中国当下刑事审判实践中存在不公开范围界定不清、不当限制公开对象、公开程度被人为限制或过度公开等现实问题,有必要以公开审判的基本属性及比例原则为依据加以规范。The right to a public trial belongs not only to the accused and the general public, but concerning multiple government interests as well. A careful balance requires that criminal trials be open to the public with applicably prescribed exceptions. The principle of proportionality shall prevail in practice, balancing multiple interests including the defendant' s burden and the right to a fair trial, the public' s right to information together with the government interests. Criminal trials in China sometimes are inappropriately restricted, either in terms of the constituents of audience or degree of openness, and sometimes are displayed to an excessive degree fur- thering extrajudicial purposes. Necessary regulatory actions shall be taken to bring the current practice back in accordance with the fundamental nature of public trial and the principle of proportionality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.80.46