检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡宏伟[1,2] 汤爱学[3] 江海霞[4] 袁水苹
机构地区:[1]华北电力大学人文与社会科学学院 [2]美国罗格斯大学华民研究中心 [3]浙江大学公共管理学院 [4]北京大学人口所
出 处:《公共行政评论》2016年第1期110-130,184-185,共21页Journal of Public Administration
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(11CGL072);河北省社科基金(HB15GL056)
摘 要:撤点并校政策的实施对贫困家庭的影响值得关注。利用西北农村地区撤点并校调研数据,采用交互、回归等分析方法,比较分析撤点并校对贫穷家庭和富裕家庭所产生的政策效应差异。结果发现,相对于富裕家庭学生,撤点并校政策对贫困家庭学生的负向影响更高,正向影响相对更低,具体表现为贫穷家庭的学生相对有更大的学习压力、成绩提高更不明显、同学关系趋向紧张,这一结论具有稳健性。在研究结论基础上,提出应从价值原则、政策目标、适用性、决策机制、政策补偿五个方面确立更为全面的政策考量体系,才能有助于重新认识、理解和调整现有的撤点并校政策。The impact of the implementation of the closure and merger of schools for poor families deserves special attention. Using survey data from northwest rural areas,we employed analysis methods such as crosstab and regression to determine the effects as between poor families and wealthy families produced by the policy of closing and merging schools. The results show that,compared with students from affluent families,the policy of closing and merging schools have a higher negative effect and a relatively lower positive effect on poor families. Students from poor families have relatively more learning pressure, more obvious needs for performance enhancement, and more tense relationships between students. We then employed a comprehensive structure including value principles,policy aims,feasibility,decision mechanisms and policy compensation to further our understanding and suggest adjustments to the school closure and merger policy in China's rural northwest.
关 键 词:撤点并校 贫困家庭学生政策效应 比较评估
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.82.179