行政权介入下的刑事裁判困境——以冤假错案的产生为分析视角  

The Dilemma of Criminal Judgment with Administrative Power Intervention——An Analysis from the Perspective of Unjust, Framed-up and Wrong Cases

作　　者：赵桂玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300071

出　　处：《行政与法》2016年第2期123-128,F0003,共7页Administration and Law

摘　　要：刑事案件裁判是一个从生活事实到裁判事实的人为建构过程。从立案侦察到审查起诉再到审判完结,包括证据收集、选择、提交、认定以及实体法和程序法的选择与适用,都离不开人的价值判断和逻辑证成,其中很多因素充满了不确定性,为冤案的产生提供了可能。从某种意义上说,冤假错案是被人为"建构"起来的,这个过程中,行政权对刑事裁判的介入如一把双刃剑,从已然查证的冤假错案来看,无不存在行政权的不当介入。The dedication of criminal cases is the artificial construction process from living facts to judging facts.The process from filing and investigation to examination and prosecution contains collection,selection,submission and determi- nation of evidence,and choice and application of substantive and procedure law,all of which depends on humanJs value judgment and logical justification.There are many factors so full of uncertainty,making it possible to produce unjust ver- dicts.ln a sense,injustice verdicts were constructed by judicial members,on this point,the administrative power interven- tion likes a ＂double-edged-sword＂ in criminal judgment,analysis from the unjust,framed-up and wrong cases,the ad- ministrative power intervention is universal.

关 键 词：行政权 生活事实 裁判事实 刑事裁判 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]