欧洲人权法院视野下的延长羁押审查及借鉴  

Research and Enlightenment on the Prolonged Detention in the Light of the European Court of Human Rights

作　　者：何永福[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《天中学刊》2016年第2期18-23,共6页Journal of Tianzhong

摘　　要：延长羁押在本质上仍属羁押,只有在公共利益的特定要求超过保护个人自由的要求时,才具有正当性。欧洲人权法院根据欧洲人权公约第5条第3款做出了关于延长羁押的一系列判决,形成了较为完善的延长羁押审查方法。我国延长侦查羁押期限制度过于简单,可以借鉴欧洲人权法院关于延长羁押的审查方法以求完善。Prolonged detention which is still detention in nature is legitimate only when the interests of the specific public interests overcome the protection of individual freedom. According to the European Convention on Human Rights paragraph 3 of article 5, the European Court of Human Rights have made a series of decisions about prolonged detention, which have formed a relatively complete review method. Prolonged detention system in China is so simple that it is necessary to draw lessons from the judicial precedent of the European Court of Human Rights.

关 键 词：欧洲人权法院 延长羁押 借鉴 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]