检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京100875 [2]纽约州立大学宾汉姆顿分校管理学院,纽约宾汉姆顿13902
出 处:《山西财经大学学报》2016年第3期68-78,共11页Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13CGL036);教育部人文社科基金项目(11YJC790132)
摘 要:使用董事会成员的性别、年龄、学历和任期四个个人特征构建群体过度自信的衡量指标,实证检验董事会过度自信对我国上市公司过度投资的影响,并分析公司治理机制对影响的调节效应。研究结果表明,董事会决策时容易产生群体过度自信,且该过度自信对公司过度投资具有显著的正向作用。从公司治理因素角度,股权集中度对董事会过度自信与过度投资之间的关系具有正向调节作用,即股权集中度越高,董事会越可能存在话语权强大的董事,这会增加董事会决策的极化倾向,进而增加过度自信导致的过度投资。董事会规模和独立董事抑制董事会过度自信引发的过度投资的效果不明显。According to the theory of group decision and groupthink, we empirically test the influence of overconfidence of board on the overinvestment of Chinese listed companies based on the board group overconfidence variable which is constructed by gender, age, education and tenure of board members. Furthermore, we study the moderating effect of corporate governance on the influence. The results indicate that the board group decision leads to group overconfidence easily. Based on the factors of corporate governance, board group decision has no effect on reducing the overconfidence of individual. There is significant positive correlation between board group overconfidence and corporate overinvestment. We also find that the higher ownership concentration, the more possible to be director who has strong discourse power. This will increase the possibility of board group polarization, and increase the level of corporate overinvestment. Increasing board size and independent directors have no use to decrease the overinvestment which is initiated by board group overconfidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42