医患纠纷调解:通过衡平实现正义  

Mediation of medical disputes: Fulfilling justice through equity

作　　者：邵华[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期42-48,共7页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：2014年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"基本医疗服务保障法制化研究"(14JD025)

摘　　要：与普通侵权纠纷相比,我国医患纠纷带有客观争议和利益争议的特点,使之难以单纯通过诉讼方式解决。目前全社会已形成制度共识,把调解作为化解医患矛盾的钥匙。对患方来说,调解可以规避诉讼索赔的种种不确定性;对医方来说,调解可以尽早解决关于过失的指控,通过沟通发现问题提高医疗服务质量;对政府来说,调解可以实现对纠纷的有效管理,提高社会管理效能。这种对不同层次需求的满足充分体现了调解对于不同利益诉求的衡平功能。为了使调解脱离那种仅仅作为使激增的医患纠纷得到简易、迅速处理的应急措施的色彩,需要针对某些相关制度进行必要的思考,为调解充分发挥衡平功能助一臂之力。Compared with regular torts, the medical malpractices in our country have different characteristic of mingling objective disputes with interest disputes so that contemporary tort-based litigation system fails to meet the character to resolve those conflicts. Since the People’s Mediation Act was promulgated, many mediation institutions were organized by local governments to resolve medical malpractices. To the patients, mediation can decrease costs and avoid the inaccuracy of litigation; to the hospitals and doctors, mediation can provide an incentive to reduce medical negligence, preserve the doctor-patient relationship whenever possible; to the government, mediation can optimize managing efficiency. In view of the advantages of mediation, the present essay argues that many problems of medical malpractice litigation can be alleviated through the simple use of mediation. Therefore, some arrangements on mediation should be taken into serious consideration for fulfilling equity justice.

关 键 词：医患纠纷 调解 衡平功能 

分 类 号：DF714[政治法律—诉讼法学]