中美大学生议论文中介入资源对比分析  

A Study on Chinese and American College Students in Argumentative Writing

作　　者：程建山[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉工程大学,湖北武汉430205

出　　处：《安顺学院学报》2016年第1期30-32,63,共4页Journal of Anshun University

基　　金：武汉工程大学教学研究项目"英语专业内容依托式教学写作课程体系创新实征研究"(项目编号:X2014024)中期成果

摘　　要：介入系统分为单声与多声,多声又分为对话扩展和对话收缩。从中美大学生议论文中介入资源的使用情况来看,中国大学生议论文中的介入资源使用频率高于美国大学生,所使用的扩展资源大于收缩资源,而美国学生使用的否认资源大于中国学生。在议论文写作中,恰当地使用介入资源能够协商命题的对话空间,构建作者与读者之间的交际互动,提高议论文的说服力。Engagement system is divided into mongooses and heterogloss, which includes dialogic expansion and contraction. The paper contrasts the engagement resources used in Chinese and American argumentative writing. It finds that the frequency of engagement resources used in Chinese students＇ writing is higher than that of American students＇ writing. Chinese students use more expansion resources than American students, while the latter uses more disclaim resources than the former. Proper use of engagement resources in argumentative writing can negotiate the dialogistic room of propositions, and construe the communicative interaction between the writer and the reader, thus improving the persuasion of argumentative essays.

关 键 词：评价理论 介入资源 议论文 

分 类 号：H319.9[语言文字—英语]