水污染物初始排污权定价策略研究——以河南省为例  

Initial pricing of emission rights of water pollution:Take Henan province as an example

作　　者：张茜[1] 于鲁冀[1,2] 王燕鹏[2] 张培[2] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学水利与环境学院,郑州450002 [2]郑州大学环境政策规划评价研究中心,郑州450002

出　　处：《南水北调与水利科技》2016年第1期165-171,共7页South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology

基　　金：国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2013ZX07603004-005)~~

摘　　要：为了探索理论和实用性兼顾的水污染物排污权初始分配价格的定价方法,在对现有排污权定价模型分析的基础上,通过对环境容量的资源性和价值性的探讨,建立了支付意愿定价模型和租金分配定价模型。以河南省为例,水污染物(以COD和氨氮为例)排污权初始分配价格计算结果为:支付意愿定价模型核算出的COD排污权价格为3 463元/t,氨氮排污权价格为4 329元/t;租金分配定价模型核算出的COD排污权价格为4 499元/t,氨氮排污权价格为9 122元/t。两种定价模型均具有一定可行性,但租金分配定价模型的定价理论更为合理,定价结果更为可靠,因此推荐以租金分配定价模型为主,以支付意愿定价模型为辅来进行水污染物初始排污权的价格制定。The purpose of the study was to explore the method that combines both theory and utility.On the basis of pricing theory of paid use of emission rights,by exploring the resources and value of the environmental capacity,the contingent value pricing method and the rent allocation pricing model were established.Then,the initial distribution prices of emission rights in Henan province were calculated using above two methods.Results showed that the emission price of COD and ammonia was respectively 3 463 and 4 329 yuan per ton when using the contingent value pricing method,which were 4 499 and 9 122 yuan per ton when using the rent allocation pricing model.The two models are both feasible.By comparing the two models,our findings indicate that the theory and results of the rent allocation pricing model are more reasonable.Therefore,rent allocation pricing model may be recommended as a main method,and the contingent value pricing model can be used as an auxiliary means.

关 键 词：水污染物 排污权 初始分配价格 支付意愿定价模型 租金分配定价模型 

分 类 号：X196[环境科学与工程—环境科学]