检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《运筹与管理》2016年第1期133-144,共12页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372134)
摘 要:本文研究了随机需求下两竞争零售商的定价策略选择(响应性定价或清仓定价)、产品订货量及响应性价格的联合决策问题。通过将问题转化为一个三阶段的博弈模型,基于Kuhn-Tucker条件求解了两零售商不同定价策略子博弈下的均衡产品订货量及响应性定价决策,分析了不同定价策略子博弈下产品订货量及价格决策的差别以及潜在市场需求不确定(期望和方差变动)对订货量和定价策略的影响。数值分析结果表明,当潜在市场需求服从均匀分布时,响应性定价子博弈是帕累托最优策略,清仓定价子博弈是零售商的均衡策略,混合定价子博弈下两零售商的收益差距较大。This paper studies a joint pricing policy ( responsive pricing or market clearance pricing) , product order quantity and responsive pricing decision for two competitive retailers under a stochastic demand environ- ment. By developing a three-stage game model, based on the Kuhn-Tucker condition, two retailers' equilibrium order quantity and responsive pricing decisions under different pricing subgames are obtained, the differences of the order quantity and responsive pricing decisions of the four pricing subgames are analyzed, and the impact of demand uncertainty on order quantity and pricing policy are investigated as well The numerical analysis shows that, when the potential market demand is uniformly distributed, responsive pricing subgame will be Pareto optimal, however, market clearance pricing subgame is the equilibrium pricing strategy of the retailers, and there is a huge income gap between the retailers under the mixed pricing subgame.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28