检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,四川成都610031 [2]西南交通大学经济管理学院,四川成都610031
出 处:《铁道学报》2016年第2期1-6,共6页Journal of the China Railway Society
基 金:国家社会科学基金(14BGL060);中国铁路总公司科技发展基金(2014X009-L)
摘 要:本文研究集装箱动态舱位控制策略,根据市场需求情况,动态调整不同等级价格舱位的数量,实现运输产品的市场化定价。铁路集装箱班列通常停靠的站点较多,动态舱位控制模型在求解过程中会出现维数灾难。本文应用降维近似求解法,将铁路集装箱多站段动态舱位控制模型转化为确定性线性规划进行求解。比较分析加和竞价与确定性等价控制两种策略,最后通过算例分析两种策略对总收益的影响,得出确定性等价控制能够保证舱位的高收益,整体上优于加和竞价策略。The dynamic slot allocation strategy for the railway container transportation was studied.According to market demand,dynamic adjustment of the number of container slots with different prices should be conducted to realize the marketized pricing of transport products.As railway container trains usually stop at many stations,the curse of dimensionality would appear in solving network dynamic capacity control model.Reduced dimension approximate solution method was applied to transform railway container multi-leg dynamic slot control model to the deterministic linear programming for model solving.A comparative analysis was made on the two strategies of additive bid prices and certainty equivalence control.Through the case analysis of the impact of the two strategies on the total revenue,it is concluded that that the certainty equivalence control,which can ensure the high income of slot,is better than additive bid prices strategy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229