清末诉讼法改革争议之探讨——以《诉讼法驳议部居》为考察中心  

A Discussion on the Dispute of Litigation Law Reform in the Late Qing Dynasty——Based on Procedural Law in the Department Refutation”

作　　者：洪佳期[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海201620

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期16-23,共8页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学研究基金一般项目"法律文明史"(11&2D081)的研究成果

摘　　要：清政府在内忧外患之下谕令变法修律,1906年完成《大清刑事民事诉讼法草案》,朝廷谕令地方封疆大吏进行讨论,其后一年多时间内各省督抚将军纷纷上奏阐明,疑其窒碍。时人赵彬将此意见编纂成《诉讼法驳议部居》,逐条罗列律文,其后附上官员的相关驳议意见。草案条文263条,驳议条文达到85条,理由各异,亦不尽然是"墨守成规",毕竟法律的移植如同"南橘北枳",要考虑所移植的本土之质,立法相对容易,但其实施成效并非一纸所能完成。In the background and era of domestic trouble and foreign invasion, the Qing government decreed law reform. After completing the ＂Great Qing Draft Criminal and Civil Procedural Law＂ in 1906, the court ordered governors in local or border provinces to hold a discussion. More than a year thereafter, provincial governors and generals have submitted their reports, which brought about great obstruction tO the government. Zhao Bin codified all of their advice into Procedural Law in the De- partment Refutation with statutes listed one by one, followed by relevant refutation comments. There were 263 draft articles and 85 refutation provisions with different justifications, not all of which were fettered by old conventions. In fact, the transplanting of law, as goes the Chinese saying ＂oranges change with the environment＂, should take the local context into consideration. It is easy to carry out legislation; however, its implementation is destined to be more than a paper of words.

关 键 词：晚清 西法东渐 诉讼法草案 《诉讼法驳议部居》 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]