司法制度变迁的知识学动力——从子产“铸刑书”说起  

Epistemological Impetus of Judicial System's Transition

作　　者：张正印[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南科技大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2016年第2期168-175,共8页Law Review

摘　　要：从历史上看,司法制度皆有特定社会法律知识组织型态与之相应,当这种知识型态发生重大改变时,司法制度就会发生相应变动。春秋时期庶民知识人的兴起是子产"铸刑书"的历史前提,其意义在于打破领主贵族的法律知识垄断,向庶民知识人让渡部分司法话语权。其后两千多年,各王朝用士族制度和士大夫制度来整合新兴知识阶层,重新树立朝廷司法权威。清末变法实质在于取消士大夫司法垄断,向庶民让渡部分司法话语权。现代司法制度建立在平面媒体技术基础上,形成庶民依赖法律精英的司法制度。网络技术让法律知识平均化趋势加快,法律精英司法权力的知识基础面临挑战。司法改革既是司法权力的重组,更是权力表象背后法律知识型态的重构。Historically, A judicial system is corresponding with some social organization pattern of legal knowledge. When such a social pattern of legal knowledge changes, the judicial system will change accordingly. It is the historic premise of Zichan action of ＂Cast criminal code＂ that plebeian intellectuals were rising during the Spring and Autumn Period, which broke up the monopoly of legal knowledge of the lords and lead to the transfer of a part judicial power to the plebeian intellectuals. Two thousand years later, each dynasty integrated intelligentsia and re--established the authority of the court through the No- ble and Scholar system. The essence of the judicial reform of Late Qing dynasty is to cancel Scholarg monopoly of legal knowledge and transfer part of justice to the common people. Modern judicial system is established upon the technology of print medias, which lead to an judiciary system in which common people have to rely on the elites. Network technology is accelerating an average trend of legal knowledge and brings challenges to the judicial elites. The judicial reform is not only a restructure of the judicial powers, but a re--organization of social legal knowledge pattern.

关 键 词：司法制度 法律精英 子产铸刑书 士族制度 士大夫制度 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]