检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《贵州警官职业学院学报》2016年第1期3-10,共8页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
摘 要:我国刑事诉讼法对逮捕进行了详细的实体和程序规定,统一了逮捕的使用条件和证明标准,并且赋予逮捕这一人身羁押程序严格的法律审查制度,充分发挥了刑事诉讼保障人权的重要功能。但是,对于逮捕的证明标准问题,特别是逮捕条件中“社会危险性”的证明问题,由于法律语言的模糊性以及司法人员不同的主观法律意识影响,一直无法统一适用,这一现象对刑诉法公平价值的有效实现形成了阻碍。The Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China has made detailed substantive and procedural provisions on arrest, unified the conditions and proof standards for arrest, applied strict examination system to the procedure of taking a person into custody and given full play to the function of protecting human rights in criminal proceedings. However, due to the ambiguity of legal language and the judicial officers' different legal awareness, the proof standards for arrest, particularly the standards proving the social risk, a prerequisite to arrest, haven't been applied uniformly. This phenomenon has caused an obstacle for effectively realizing the fair value of the Criminal Procedure Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.91.70