牙周翻瓣术后局部应用两种塞治剂的临床效果评价  

Clinical effective evaluation of using two kinds of types periodontal pack after periodontal flap surgery abstract

作　　者：宋玲[1] 刘家宁[1] 袁晓[1] 张春艳[1] 刘文[1] 郭大伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]青岛市市立医院口腔科,山东266011

出　　处：《中华老年口腔医学杂志》2016年第1期14-17,共4页Chinese Journal of Geriatric Dentistry

基　　金：山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(项目编号:2013WS0014);青岛市医药卫生科技发展计划项目(项目编号:2012-WSZD005);青岛市市立医院总院长科研专项基金计划项目(项目编号:ZYZJJ-2013-W020-配);青岛市医疗卫生优秀人才培养项目资助

摘　　要：目的:评价老年患者牙周翻瓣术后术区使用两种塞治剂的短期临床应用效果。方法:选取牙周翻瓣手术40例,随机分为两组,术后分别应用传统塞治剂和加入二甲胺四环素的改良型塞治剂,术后3天、7天复诊,检查并记录患者临床反应以及牙周指标。结果:改良式塞治剂和传统塞治剂相比在止痛、抑菌和减轻黏膜创伤方面有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:加入二甲胺四环素的塞治剂在牙周翻瓣术后有较好的临床应用效果。Objective： To evaluate the clinical effect of using two kinds of types periodontal pack after periodontal flap surgery. Methods： 40 periodontal flap surgery cases were selected, randomly divided into traditional periodontal pack group and a kind of minocycline periodontal pack group were used respectively. Clinical examinations were taken to follow up at 3and 7 days after the operation. Results： There were significant differences between minocycline pack group and traditional periodontal pack group in acesodyne, bacteriostatic activity and trauma of mucous membrane （P〈0.05）. Conclusions： Using Minocycline periodontal pack after periodontal flap surgery has better clinical treatment effect.

关 键 词：老年人 翻瓣术 盐酸二甲胺四环素 塞治剂 

分 类 号：R781.4[医药卫生—口腔医学]