聚众犯罪的因果关系探析  

Analysis on Causes and Effects of Organized Crimes

作　　者：朱虹[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《湖南人文科技学院学报》2016年第1期11-15,共5页Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology

基　　金：西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划项目"聚众犯罪的因果关系的司法认定"(XZYJS2014087)

摘　　要：聚众犯罪责任主体在刑事归责上存在明显的差异性,这与其因果关系密切相关。要判断聚众犯罪的因果关系,需对其危害行为和危害结果进行分析:就危害行为而言,聚众行为是聚众犯罪的实行行为,而实行行为的着手是开始进行聚众;就危害后果而言,包括危害行为对刑法所保护的社会关系所造成的实际损害和现实危险。结合客观归责理论,可将聚众犯罪的因果关系分为一因一果和多因一果,前种情形下,只有首要分子的行为造成了危害后果,所以只对首要分子进行归责,后者则是多个行为人的行为造成了危害后果,因此需要对多个行为人进行归责。Perpetrators of organized crimes are held liable in different ways because of the causes and effects of the crime they committed. To decide the causes and effects of an organized crime,we need to analyze the criminal act and the resulting damages.As far as the criminal act is concerned,the act of assembling is the criminal conduct that begins with gathering a crowd. And the resulting damages include the actual damages and dangers to the social relations protected by the criminal law. Based on the theories of objective imputation,the causes and effects of organized crimes can be classified into two types： one cause and one effect,and multiple causes and one effect. In the former case,only the leading perpetrators＇ acts cause damages,and therefore only they are held liable. In the latter case,it is the acts of multiple perpetrators that cause damages; and therefore,multiple perpetrators should be held liable.

关 键 词：聚众犯罪 危害行为 危害后果 客观归责 因果关系 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]