检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江怡[1]
出 处:《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第2期1-8,共8页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"分析哲学运动与当代哲学发展研究"(12&ZD118)
摘 要:德国古典哲学历来被看做哲学研究的模板,然而,研究发现,造成这种看法有其历史的和时代的原因。中国传统哲学与德国古典哲学在精神风格上的契合以及历史的原因,使得中国哲学更容易把德国古典哲学接受为这样的模板。西方哲学的近代发展以及当代哲学的演变又使得德国古典哲学逐渐变成西方哲学史上的一个特殊历史阶段或特殊哲学形态。重新审视德国古典哲学会帮助我们更好地认识西方哲学的近现代发展,由此帮助我们更好地理解哲学的性质。The classic Germen philosophy has been considered as a model in philosophy. But it is argued that there are some historic reasons to make such a model. In this paper I argue that there are some similarities between Germen philosophy and Chinese philosophy which made Chinese philosophers be likely to accept classic Germen philosophy as the model. Moreover,I explain by evidences that the early modern philosophy and the contemporary philosophy in the West illuminated that classic Germen philosophy must be a special part of the Western philosophy in history. I would like to show by such an explanation that the re- evaluation of the classic Germen philosophy will help us to understand the modern Western philosophy in deep as well as the nature of philosophy in general.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3