自下而上改革:对行政诉讼“和解撤诉”的检视——以诉讼参与人的选择评价为视角  

The Bottom-up Reform: View of Administrative Litigation “Reconciliation Withdrawal”——The perspective of the selection and evaluation of the participants in the proceedings

作　　者：梁潇[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120 [2]中共重庆市委党校,重庆400000

出　　处：《河北法学》2016年第4期166-179,共14页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：自1987年基层法院审理行政案件伊始,"和解撤诉"便伴随产生。而作为实实在在参与到这个过程中的当事人而言,对这种解决纠纷的方式有何评价和见解,是衡量该方式优劣最有发言权的人。为了能较为准确地了解当事人的真实感受和见解,课题组以中国西南J区法院为考察对象,采用了问卷调查和回访两种方式对该法院25年来的行政诉讼撤诉案件进行了全面梳理,以实证分析的方法,对诉讼参与人参与"和解撤诉"成因、看法、满意度等进行考察,得出诉讼参与人对行政审判的基本立场。从制度完善的角度审视当事人需要什么样的纠纷解决制度,并在此基础上提出"自下而上"的改革建议。Since 1987 the grass-roots court administrative cases at the beginning,＂reconciliation withdrawal＂will be accompanied by. And as a real participation in the process of the parties concerned,the way to resolve disputes in the way of theevaluation and opinion,is a measure of the pros and cons of the most right to speak.In order to more accurate understanding of the parties that the true feelings and views,research group in southwestern China J district court as the object of study,the questionnaire investigation and visit two ways on the court in 25 years of administrative withdrawal cases were comprehensively, using empirical analysis method,participants in the proceedings in ＂reconciliation withdrawal ＂ causes,perceptions and satisfaction were investigated,and concludes that the lawsuit to participate in human＇s basic position of the administrative trial. From the perspective of the system to improve the party＇s needs of what kind of dispute settlement system,and on this basis,put forward the ＂bottom-up＂reform proposals.

关 键 词：行政诉讼 “和解撤诉” 诉讼参与人 自下而上 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]